Analysis of the Agenda vs. Minutes

The agenda item was: G. Resource and Revenue generation methods – Secretary

This is a fairly narrow and vague topic. A reasonable person reading the agenda would expect discussion about possible fundraising, donations, or alternative revenue ideas – not a detailed discussion about:

  • Rising costs of gravel and machine rates
  • Reduced frequency of maintenance and gravel volume to “stretch” budgets
  • Future plans for setting the 2027 “levy”

These are budget and operational matters that go well beyond the stated agenda item.

Why This Matters (Legal Perspective)

Under SDCL 1-25-1 (Open Meetings Law):

  • The public is entitled to reasonable notice of the matters to be discussed.
  • Public bodies are generally expected to stick to the posted agenda.
  • Adding significant new topics (especially financial/budget issues) without proper notice can constitute a violation.

This is particularly problematic because:

  • Budget and levy discussions directly affect landowners’ wallets.
  • The board had already been publicly reprimanded by the Open Meetings Commission for previous violations.
  • They continue to show a pattern of loose compliance with the law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *